Contents
This paper is based on the following question - - Assess the free will theodicy of one of Alvin Plantinga. In taking account of some of the most significant critiques of his approach, to what extent does his argument nonetheless succeed in overcoming the (a) logical problem, and (b) evidential problems of evil.
Description
In the book, ‘God, freedom, and evil’, Alvin Plantinga characterized Natural Atheology as the skeptical endeavor to demonstrate that God does not exist (Plantinga, 1974). Here, he presented the agnostic claim which recommended that the presence of insidiousness in light of a transcendent, omniscient, as well as omni-generous God was conflicting as well as opposing. In the section of Natural Theology, Plantinga commentated on the three noteworthy philosophical contentions used to legitimize God's presence: the cosmological, teleological argument, and the ontological conflict. The present article aims to critique Alvin’s Free Will Defense, with a specific end goal to figure out if or not his contention tackled the logical problem of evil. This assignment will be proficient by scrutinizing the Free Will Defense at different inept focuses in the contention keeping in mind the end goal to distinguish this safeguard as an adequate response to the problem of evil.
