Urgent Assignment Help

Case study on VRD Industries Singapore

Words : 2400
    Problem Statement:
    You need to consider how you will identify the range of issues and problems in the following
    problem statement.
    Lee Bineesh is a highly qualified but aggressive Singaporean CEO educated in Sydney
    who has just taken over as CEO of a company we shall call VRD Industries located in
    Singapore. Lee had a track record of working in fast cycle markets and achieving above
    average growth in developing industries. Lee’s arrival at VRD was greeted with much initial
    surprise followed by a steely resolve to change things. For over 40 years, the company
    manufactured component parts for the auto industry in both Europe, GM in the US and other
    US automakers. Recently, VRD has also exported to GM in China which has been identified
    as a growth market. VRD operated as three product-divisional strategic business units (SBUs)
    all located within the same industrial complex: 1) Automotive Parts 2) Infotainment and 3)
    Electrical & Energy. Each SBU has its own Divisional General Manager with a small office
    staff, a manufacturing manager, Quality Control Engineers, Process Supervisors, leading
    hands and upwards of 150 staff working within each factory centre. The three SBUs shared
    the normal Head Office functions of R&D, Technical, HR, Sales & Marketing, Accounting
    and Warehouse and Distribution. The top management team comes from the main VRD Head
    Office structure (8 senior managers). Middle management consists of about12 managers in
    each factory. Functional or line managers consist of another 6 managers.
    Lee took over from Frank Delacy who had worked his way up in the business from the
    factory and had retired at age 70. For over 30 years, Frank had a steady team of managers at
    each of the SBUs including middle managers. Staff turnover was low with most managers
    (functional staff included) having been with the company for over 20 years. Staff loyalty to
    Frank was extremely high. Changes had been few. Despite discontinuities within the auto
    industry, Frank and some senior sales staff had built up long-term relationships at Detroit
    resulting in a fairly consistent sales growth with consistent supply contracts to Europe.
    Recently, discontinuities and the relentless pace of competition from China, Taiwan and
    Vietnam for component exports placed heavy pressure on VRD to compete. A new line of
    managers at Detroit following the GFC and aggravated supply contracts out of Europe meant
    sales had halved. This coincided with Frank’s retirement placing heavy pressure on Lee
    and the top team. Lee also appointed a change manager, May Wong, to assist the divisional
    and manufacturing managers to implement a change agenda. After some weeks of constant
    review, Lee realised that the company was too slow in production, had old job design
    methods and that conflict existed between the SBU divisional managers and their teams and
    between each SBU.
    The basis of the conflict related to maintaining the current processes and systems that had
    held the company in good stead for many years and the type of change being imposed by
    Lee. For his part, Lee wanted an agile company, highly responsive to shifting markets, a
    cooperative team, and a highly efficient production process. It was no surprise then that each
    divisional manager had been advised that a staff reduction of 10 per cent had to occur within
    the next 6 months. This was difficult for senior management who had long-standing
    friendships with lower managers and line staff dating back to the 1990s and in some cases,
    the 1980s. Indeed, some factory staff had been on the same machine and processes for over
    20 years. That processes needed to change and that manager’s had to “get off their backsides
    and do some real work” had suddenly become the ‘new’ culture. This shocked the senior
    team as they were more familiar with Frank’s easier fine-tuning and collaborative style. The
    problems and issues facing VRD came to a head for Lee after May’s quite detailed interviews
    and assessment of staff practices and policies. Mays exit polls consisting of qualitative
    questionnaires and several focus groups revealed further issues. Warehousing and
    Distribution staff accused sales and marketing of imposing unrealistic delivery estimates.
    Sales and marketing accused warehousing of being ‘too slow’. Fractious lines of
    communication started to appear within groups in each factory since more pressure was being
    placed on divisions for more efficiency. Also, following Frank’s departure, the impact of less
    capital expenditure and funds for resources appeared to create conflict between each SBU
    manager competing for a decreasing slice of the pie. This led to falling morale, a clash
    between managers for updating technical processes, and lower-level staff accusing managers
    of ruining a perfectly good company. After 6 months of constant conflict and falling sales,
    Lee asks May to also hire an outside change consultancy firm to assist the organisation deal
    with its next phase of growth. Lee was struggling for control and May was being flooded
    with an increasing list of day-to-day issues.
    Task -required: Based on less than perfect information supplied about the VRD
    problem statement, you are required to act as an external change consultant to assist
    the firm to:
    Develop a set of realistic assumptions that you can add to the issues and problems
    expressed. These might typically be related to each other at: a) the organisational
    level, b) the group level, c) the individual level. For instance, you might develop
    assumptions about leadership, about teams at each level, about creative thinking or
    lack of creative thinking, about innovation. List each assumption and discuss in a
    paragraph why you have chosen this assumption. (Total 150–200 words)
    In reference to the classic article by Larry Greiner, explain what is happening
    between growth and change in VRD industries. (150–200 words)
    May Wong advises Lee that the experiences of the company relate to incremental
    change and that solutions will gradually come to be realised. Is that right? Why or
    why not? Explain your answer with reference to three or more readings cited in the
    course
    Why is the company finding it difficult to change given the theory-to-practice link?
    (100–150 words)
    Using the open system model outlined in your study book and text, identify the
    issues (from the problem statement and from your own assumptions) by redrawing
    and populating each connecting box. Complete this exercise for as many times as you
    see connecting systems within (or external to) the company that is influencing
    change. (600–700 words excluding boxes)
    Evidence: From point 5, use theory to justify your selection of the open systems
    identified. Here, you should use at least 7-10 separate references from the study book
    that support your selections and systems’ linkages. (900–1000 words).

Express

48-72 Hours

250$

25$ per page

Fast

4-10 Days

200$

20$ per page

Standard

11+ days

150$

15$ per page

Looking for a Solution to the Assignment above, we have a team of experts who have a complete expertise in completing this assignment within your specified deadline. The assignment will be uniquly made for you and will be delivered along with Turntin Plagiarism report.

Get A Quote:


Why Us?

Features

Money Back Guaraantee
in case of missed deadline
No Plagiarism
Guarantee
Emergency delivery
within few hours.
Whatsapp contact